<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ramblings of a semi sane person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secadmin.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>This is my collection of thoughts, feelings, and wonderings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon FiOS and the security of my home network by Trackback - Cheap Internation Call &#62;&#62; How to make cheap international call</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/verizon-fios-and-the-security-of-my-home-network/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackback - Cheap Internation Call &#62;&#62; How to make cheap international call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=152#comment-253</guid>
		<description>,..] secadmin.wordpress.com is other interesting source of information on this topic,..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,..] secadmin.wordpress.com is other interesting source of information on this topic,..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Passed a Potential Security Risk???? by Luke</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/passed-a-potential-security-risk/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/passed-a-potential-security-risk/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>So, what does this message actually mean though.  Is it safe to delete the file?  The file that gives us this message is called sys.dat which sounds pretty important to delete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what does this message actually mean though.  Is it safe to delete the file?  The file that gives us this message is called sys.dat which sounds pretty important to delete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iSCSI Configuration with Lefthand and Quorum Management by Helmut</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/iscsi-configuration-with-lefthand-and-quorum-management/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Hello

i wil test the Lefthand VSA and i need the FOM App.

Please uplad the file for me?

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>i wil test the Lefthand VSA and i need the FOM App.</p>
<p>Please uplad the file for me?</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on fiber channel vs. iscsi by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/fiber-channel-vs-iscsi/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=357#comment-250</guid>
		<description>iSCSI isn&#039;t bad. But you need a usecase for it. If you need MB/s, you will get much more performance with FC, FC is much more efficient then iSCSI. 98,5% of a FC frame is data, not overhead. With iSCSI you will get maybe up to 60 or 70% usable bandwidth for data. 10 GbE is nice, but 8 GB is faster. Sure, FC isn&#039;t a cheap technology, but it&#039;s not an option to choose such an important infrastructure (storage) by price. You should choose the technology because it&#039;s the right technology for you company, for your needs and for you budget. Some of my customers are running FC and iSCSI. Depending on the needs, they deploy FC, iSCSI or NFS/ CIFS to there internal customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iSCSI isn&#8217;t bad. But you need a usecase for it. If you need MB/s, you will get much more performance with FC, FC is much more efficient then iSCSI. 98,5% of a FC frame is data, not overhead. With iSCSI you will get maybe up to 60 or 70% usable bandwidth for data. 10 GbE is nice, but 8 GB is faster. Sure, FC isn&#8217;t a cheap technology, but it&#8217;s not an option to choose such an important infrastructure (storage) by price. You should choose the technology because it&#8217;s the right technology for you company, for your needs and for you budget. Some of my customers are running FC and iSCSI. Depending on the needs, they deploy FC, iSCSI or NFS/ CIFS to there internal customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iSCSI Configuration with Lefthand and Quorum Management by Zeus Wing</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/iscsi-configuration-with-lefthand-and-quorum-management/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeus Wing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-247</guid>
		<description>@secadmin

Can you reupload the FOM, its no longer available for download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@secadmin</p>
<p>Can you reupload the FOM, its no longer available for download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to clean up outlook 2007 calendar by paolo</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/how-to-clean-up-outlook-2007-calendar/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/how-to-clean-up-outlook-2007-calendar/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>grazie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grazie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why can&#8217;t Windows be like AS/400 or Mac OSX? by What can’t Windows be like AS/400 or Mac OSX? &#124; Online - Online.com.pt</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/what-cant-windows-be-like-as400-or-mac-osx/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>What can’t Windows be like AS/400 or Mac OSX? &#124; Online - Online.com.pt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=346#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] View original post aqui :  What can’t Windows be like AS/400 or Mac OSX? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post aqui :  What can’t Windows be like AS/400 or Mac OSX? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by axe</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/about/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Thank God... am I from NY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God&#8230; am I from NY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iSCSI Configuration with Lefthand and Quorum Management by Stephan Stelter</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/iscsi-configuration-with-lefthand-and-quorum-management/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Stelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Robinson - thanks for the feedback!  Per my email to you, I think you&#039;ll want to check your configuration - Failover Manager intervenes much more rapidly than 43 seconds - it is much closer to instantaneous than that.  I suspect your test systems are strapped for memory.  Put the Failover Manager on any system capable of running VMware Player or another ESX host - you definitely don&#039;t want it on  the same system(s) as the VSA...

Best regards,
Stephan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robinson &#8211; thanks for the feedback!  Per my email to you, I think you&#8217;ll want to check your configuration &#8211; Failover Manager intervenes much more rapidly than 43 seconds &#8211; it is much closer to instantaneous than that.  I suspect your test systems are strapped for memory.  Put the Failover Manager on any system capable of running VMware Player or another ESX host &#8211; you definitely don&#8217;t want it on  the same system(s) as the VSA&#8230;</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Stephan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iSCSI Configuration with Lefthand and Quorum Management by Robinson Maureira</title>
		<link>http://secadmin.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/iscsi-configuration-with-lefthand-and-quorum-management/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinson Maureira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secadmin.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-241</guid>
		<description>OK, test is done. Everything worked like a charm. On a busy network, it took 43 seconds to do the failover, the machines that have the LUN presented went to 100% IOWAIT during that time.

After that, everything regained consistency. No data loss, no lost transactions, just a small &quot;freeze&quot; of ~40 seconds. My client is impressed with the result.

The main concern is still the lack of automated Virtual Manager startup on the surviving node, so they can deploy two machines without requiring a third virtual machine to regain quorum.

My next lab will be a VMware cluster without storage but with HA.

Thanks again for all your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, test is done. Everything worked like a charm. On a busy network, it took 43 seconds to do the failover, the machines that have the LUN presented went to 100% IOWAIT during that time.</p>
<p>After that, everything regained consistency. No data loss, no lost transactions, just a small &#8220;freeze&#8221; of ~40 seconds. My client is impressed with the result.</p>
<p>The main concern is still the lack of automated Virtual Manager startup on the surviving node, so they can deploy two machines without requiring a third virtual machine to regain quorum.</p>
<p>My next lab will be a VMware cluster without storage but with HA.</p>
<p>Thanks again for all your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
